Questions about Lenovo ThinkVision T34w-20

It does not have a loudspeaker. You must buy this separately.

A year ago we paid 666 instead of almost 1100. I searched around everywhere and Galaxus was the cheapest. The appliance cable was fitted with a Schuko, hence the lower price. Maybe there is a new model on the way and to create storage space, the screens are given away at a lower price ==> promotions usually don't consist of the latest devices!

No, the screen does not have a speaker or a camera.

Yes, that will work, because this relatively old processor can actually also do 4K, which is the technical data for the video resolution of the processor: 4K support Yes, at 60Hz Max. Resolution (HDMI)‡ 4096x2304@24Hz Max. Resolution (DP)‡ 4096x2304@60Hz Max. Resolution (eDP - integrated flat screen)‡ 4096x2304@60Hz However, because it is supported, I would choose a 4K UHD screen right away, because you have much more picture content with it. They are not expensive either, this one would be ideal, for example: LG 32BN67U-B (3840 x 2160 Pixels, 32 ")

No, that works quite simply with the help of the Windows built-in functions, simply drag a window to the left of the screen edge and then release it and Windows then asks which window should now be added to the right. It also works with 4 windows, simply drag them to the corners and then release. However, I wouldn't buy a 2560 x 1440 pixel screen, but a 4K UHD monitor with 32 inches and 3840 x 2160 pixel resolution, because you can still read the smaller texts very well. The additional option of being able to display more text in width and height is also more optimal and these UHD screens are slightly less wide than the 34 inch models. My suggestion starts at less than 600 francs, the three can all display 4K UHD with this resolution, are height-adjustable and also have USB-C: LG 32UL750-W (3840 x 2160 Pixels, 31.50 ") Samsung LF32TU870VRXEN (3840 x 2160 Pixels, 32 ") Philips P-line 328P6VUBREB (3840 x 2160 Pixels, 32 ")

I was told at the St Gallen shop that they had mistakenly included the product twice and that they would correct it. It had been for a few months...