CHF244.–
Brother QL-1110NWBc
300 dpi
Questions about Brother QL-1110NWBc
What would you like to know?
0 questions and answers
Ja. Den Brother P-touch Editor.
digitec
1 year ago
Helpful answer
Yes, the Brother QL-1110NWBc is suitable for printing direct-to-adhesive shipping labels. The printer supports a maximum print width of 103 mm, which is sufficient for many standard shipping labels. It is also compatible with various shipping label software packages, making it easier to print labels for shipping.
Automatically generated from the .
We also use the label printer to print shipping labels. The A6 format works perfectly. We have not yet managed to print directly from the Post-App in A7 format. A6 works perfectly. We use the DK-22243 print roll for this.
Helpful answer
I use it for my Bricklink shop it works well with the Post website via app I don't do it yet
I would use this printer for parcels 103x164 and for letters I would recommend the 810W with 100x62
There are only a few labels included but not a whole roll would order them at the same time
I use the DK-22246 labels (roll) to print the A6 labels from the post office. It works fine. Sometimes I print in landscape direction, which saves paper, but makes the font quite small.
Helpful answer
We use the printer for exactly that. Shopify and Swiss Post Label Printer. There are at least 2 types of labels that work. The labels are also cut, but we use pre-cut labels anyway. So it would also work without cutting.
Helpful answer
No, the printer is operated from the mains.
None at all. You only need matching label rolls. The printer works with direct thermal printing.
I use the following label. Length must be defined. I set 80mm and it all fits.
Brother Etiketten DK
Helpful answer
Good day 😊
Yes, that's exactly what I do with this device.
Best wishes and Merry Christmas
Helpful answer
Yes, except for routing.
Brother support says the CUPS driver for QL-1100 is good for this thing too.
And I quote... "QL1100 is same as QL1110NWB"
Helpful answer
Yes, this works perfectly. We use the endless label for this.
According to my research, this should unfortunately not work
17 of 17 questions