

Five ultrabooks go head to head: Acer vs Asus vs Dell vs HP vs Lenovo

We compared five ultrabooks to see how they fared when pitted against each other. They all had their merits but there could only be one winner.
Acer, Asus, Dell, HP and Lenovo have to give it their all because we’ll be looking at the details. Who do you think drew the short straw when it came to getting their hands on the performance crown?
But first off, we need to take a closer look at the devices that will be battling it out in the ring:
Here’s the technical data for all the competing ultrabooks:
Acer Spin 5
(SP515-51GN-88U9) | Asus ZenBook Pro
(UX580GD-BN017T) | Dell XPS 15 | HP Spectre x360
(15-CH060NZ) | Lenovo YOGA
(730-15IKB) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Prozessor | Intel Core i7-8550U | Intel Core i7-8750H | Intel Core i7-8705G | Intel Core i7-8705G | Intel Core i7-8550U |
Grafikkarte | Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 | Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 | AMD Radeon RX Vega 870 | AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL | Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 |
RAM | 16 GB RAM (SO-DIMM, DDR4-2400, 2 x 8 GB Hynix) | 16 GB RAM (SO-DIMM, DDR4-2400, 2 x 8 GB SanMax) | 16 GB RAM (SO-DIMM, DDR4-2400, 1 x 16 GB Hynix) | 16 GB RAM (SO-DIMM, DDR4-2400, 2 x 8 GB SanMax) | 16 GB RAM (SO-DIMM, DDR4-2666, 2 x 8 GB Hynix) |
Datenspeicher | 256 GB SSD, 1 TB HDD | 1 TB SSD | 512 GB SSD | 512 GB SSD | 512 GB SSD |
Display | 15.6” Full-HD-IPS-Touchscreen
(1920 x 1080 Pixel) | 15.6” Full-HD-IPS-Display
(1920 x 1080 Pixel) | 15.6” UHD-IPS-Touchscreen
(3840 x 2160 Pixel) | 15.6” UHD-IPS-Touchscreen
(3840 x 2160 Pixel) | 15.6” Full-HD-IPS-Touchscreen
(1920 x 1080 Pixel) |
Akku | 4-Zellen Li-Ionen-Akku mit 48 Wh | 8-Zellen Li-Ionen-Akku mit 71 Wh | 6-Zellen Li-Ionen-Akku mit 75 Wh | 6-Zellen Li-Ionen-Akku mit 84 Wh | 3-Zellen Li-Ionen-Akku mit 51.5 Wh |
Betriebssystem | Windows 10 Home | Windows 10 Home | Windows 10 Pro | Windows 10 Home | Windows 10 Home |
Besonderheiten | Sifteingabe möglich | ScreenPad (Touchpad kann als Second-Screen verwendet werden) | Sifteingabe möglich | Sifteingabe möglich | Sifteingabe möglich |
Abmessungen (H x L x B) | 1.79 x 25.81 x 38.15 cm | 1.89 x 25.1 x 36.5 cm | 1.6 x 23.5 x 35.4 cm | 1.94 x 25 x 35.9 cm | 1.7 x 24.9 x 36 cm |
Gewicht | 2.20 kg | 1.89 kg | 2 kg | 2.14 kg | 1.90 kg |
The main differences between the components of the devices are in the the graphics options and the displays (more on that later). Acer, Asus and Lenovo all come with Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050. Meanwhile Dell and HP rely on dedicated graphics power in the form of AMD’s Radeon RX Vega. I’m already intrigued to see who’ll come up trumps: AMD or Nvidia.
Design and ports

All the manufacturers of the five devices we tested opted for an aluminium chassis. But for me, the only one that actually felt like aluminium was the Dell. I personally thought the Dell and HP devices had the best finish.

Although all the ultrabooks feature a 15.6” display, the differences in size are noticeable. It’s even more distinct when you put the devices one on top of the other. The shiny blue beast at the bottom of the pile is the 38.15 cm long Acer ultrabook. Stacked above in the following order are the HP, Lenovo and Asus ultrabooks, with the most compact device from Dell coming in at just 35.4 cm in length on the top.

In terms of functionality, the Asus device is the one that stands out because the
display on the ZenBook Pro doesn’t fold all the way back.
As far as ports go, here’s an easy overview of what each device is fitted with:
Acer Spin 5
(SP515-51GN-88U9) | Asus ZenBook Pro
(UX580GD-BN017T) | Dell XPS 15 | HP Spectre x360
(15-CH060NZ) | Lenovo YOGA
(730-15IKB) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Netzanschluss | 1 x | 1 x | 1 x | 1 x | |
Netzanschluss inkl. Thunderbolt (USB Type-C) | 1 x | ||||
HDMI | 1 x | 1 x | 1 x | 1 x | |
USB Type-A | 3 x | 2 x | 1 x | 2 x | |
USB Type-C | 1 x | 2 x | |||
USB Type-C / Thunderbolt | 2 x | 1 x | 2 x | 1 x | |
Klinkenanschluss (kombiniert) | 1 x | 1 x | 1 x | 1 x | 1 x |
Kensington-Schloss | 1 x | 1 x | |||
SD Slot | 1 x | 1 x | |||
MicroSD Slot | 1 x | 1 x |
What catches our attention here is the fact that, aside from the Dell XPS 15, all the devices come with an HDMI output. If you wanted to connect an external display to the Dell, you’d need a Thunderbolt adapter. The same goes for USB A.
Display: 2 x UHD, 3 x full HD
Apart from the Asus ZenBook Pro, all the ultrabooks feature a touchscreen, which can also be operated with a pen. Another thing that sets the others apart from the Asus ZenBook Pro is that they can all be used as a tablet, because the screen can fold all the way down. But let’s face it, a tablet that weighs 2 kg is no fun.
Even though it might seem like Asus is lagging behind in the match, this device has something that all the others don’t: the ScreenPad. (You can use the touchpad as a second screen.) Find out more in our [Asus Zenbook Pro review](in German)(https://www.digitec.ch/en/s1/page/asus-zenbook-pro-bloss-eine-spielerei-8409).

If we look at the panel resolution, the devices that punch above their weight are the Dell and HP. These ultrabooks offer UHD resolution, while the others «only» provide full HD. Given that all the manufacturers use IPS technology, the colours appear more natural. As a result, these types of displays also lend themselves to working with applications such as Photoshop.


In comparison, the viewing angle on the the Acer Spin 5 display is only partially stable. And on the brightest setting the screen is a bit darker than the other displays. Another thing I don’t like about this model is that the edges on the display measure 1.9 cm on each side. Meanwhile, the edges at the top and bottom of the screen are even larger at 2.5 cm.
This really doesn’t have to be the case. Take Dell as an example, with its display edges coming in at a mere 4 mm. It’s not just that it makes the screen look great, it also lets the manufacturer sheer centimetres off the size of the ultrabook.


Keyboard
If you’re accustomed to a mechanical keyboard, typing on these ultrabooks might take a bit of getting used to. All of the keyboards we road-tested had a key drop of 1.5 mm or less. What’s helpful is all the keyboards offer distinct resistance. The typing experience is almost identical on the Acer, Asus, HP and Lenovo. In other words, it’s not taxing on your fingers or wrists and typing itself is quiet. The resistance is only slight but it’s palpable.


Dell’s keyboard, on the other hand, is clearly audible and the resistance is a bit stronger. If I were picking a device purely based on what it felt like to type on, it would be the Dell – I like this keyboard the most. Part of the reason for that is Dell is the only manufacturer in this group to have splashed out on a rubber surface for the palmrest.

Another deciding factor when you’re buying an ultrabook could be the keyboard layout. If you like having a keypad from the get-go, you’ll need to head straight for the Acer Spin 5 or the HP Spectre x360.


Battery performance
I carried out two tests to determine battery performance. The first lets me see how long the ultrabooks hold up under full load. The second shows each ultrabook’s capacity during a standard task.
HeavyLoad stress test
HeavyLoad pushes the ultrabooks’ performance to the limit. In practice that means the RAM, SSD, graphics card and processor are constantly running at full load. Before each test I set the display brightness to the highest setting.

Results of the stress test:
Dauer bis zum automatischen Shutdown | |
---|---|
Acer Spin 5
(SP515-51GN-88U9) | 1 h 58 min |
Lenovo YOGA
(730-15IKB) | 1 h 42 min |
HP Spectre x360
(15-CH060NZ) | 1 h 34 min |
Asus ZenBook Pro
(UX580GD-BN017T) | 1 h 20 min |
Dell XPS 15 | 1 h 17 min |
The Acer Spin 5 wins this round, with it operating just shy of two hours at full load. As a general rule, it’s safe to assume that the lowest performing device will hold up the longest. Whether that’s also the case here awaits to be seen in the benchmark tests below.
YouTube continuous streaming
Before the test, I made sure the screen brightness was on the middle level on all the ultrabooks. When it came to the Acer Spin 5, I judged it by eye and set the screen a bit brighter as the panel is slightly darker – something I touched upon earlier.
Here’s what the devices scored when they were put in the ring for the YouTube continuous streaming round:
Dauer bis zum automatischen Shutdown | |
---|---|
HP Spectre x360
(15-CH060NZ) | 8 h 47 min |
Acer Spin 5
(SP515-51GN-88U9) | 8 h 29 min |
Lenovo YOGA
(730-15IKB) | 8 h 25 min |
Dell XPS 15 | 7 h 20 min |
Asus ZenBook Pro
(UX580GD-BN017T) | 6 h 02 min |
HP won this with its ability to stream continuously for almost nine hours. Given its 84 Wh, that’s not so surprising. What got me sitting up and taking notice was Acer and Lenovo managing 8.5 hours with their meagre 48 Wh and 51.5 Wh respectively. With its 75 Wh, the Dell ultrabook still made it to 7 hours and 20 minutes. Meanwhile, Asus (71 Wh, six hours running time) should maybe consider reworking the device so it has improved battery performance.
Performance
As you’re about to see, it’s not easy to get a clear picture of the ultrabooks’ performance. The official drivers of the Vega graphics cards cause problems when combined with 3DMark.
Cinebench R15
Maxon’s Cinebench isn’t really made for testing gaming performance as it scales to 256 CPU threads and focuses on floating point performance. (The calculations for Cinema 4D, the mother of this benchmark, are normally carried out at large server farms.) This means that processors with more cores always deliver a better result. Today’s games and office applications usually only support two, four or six CPU cores – in other words, up to two threads.
In summary, if you want to compare processors with Cinebench R15, you can only do that when both processors have the same number of threads.
This is how the ultrabooks fare according to Cinebench R15:
Open GL (fps) | CPU Score | |
---|---|---|
Dell XPS 15 | 113.86 fps | 717 (CPU mit 8 Threads) |
HP Spectre x360
(15-CH060NZ) | 112.86 fps | 794 (CPU mit 8 Threads) |
Asus ZenBook Pro
(UX580GD-BN017T) | 105.96 fps | 1227 (CPU mit 12 Threads) |
Lenovo YOGA
(730-15IKB) | 101.48 fps | 713 (CPU mit 8 Threads) |
Acer Spin 5
(SP515-51GN-88U9) | 95.62 fps | 556 (CPU mit 8 Threads) |
AMD’s Vega manages to let the Dell XPS 15 and HP Spectre x360 come out on top in the OpenGL test. As far as CPU performance is concerned, the Acer Spin 5 seems to be having a few problems. Even though it has the same processor (Intel Core i7-8550U) as the Lenovo YOGA, it has a much lower score.
3DMark Fire Strike
The DirectX benchmark Fire Strike is best for determining gaming performance. But the official driver from AMD’s Vega isn’t supported, which is why the following results should be taken with a pinch of salt.
Erreichte Fire Strike-Punktzahl | |
---|---|
Dell XPS 15 | 6266 (Achtung: Kein gültiges Resultat. Offizieller Grafiktreiber ist nicht zulässig.) |
HP Spectre x360
(15-CH060NZ) | 6142 (Achtung: Kein gültiges Resultat. Offizieller Grafiktreiber ist nicht zulässig.) |
Asus ZenBook Pro
(UX580GD-BN017T) | 5445 |
Acer Spin 5
(SP515-51GN-88U9) | 4852 |
Lenovo YOGA
(730-15IKB) | 4246 |
If you want to compare the results online, click below :
- See (the invalid) results for the Dell XPS 15...
- See (the invalid) results for the HP Spectre x360...
- See the results for the Asus ZenBook Pro...
- See the results for the Acer Spin 5...
- See the results for the Lenovo YOGA...
In-game benchmark Far Cry 5
With the graphics quality set to «high» and the resolution at 1920 x 1080 pixels, we’re ready to go into the next benchmark round.
Min. fps | Ø fps | Max. fps | |
---|---|---|---|
Dell XPS 15 | 33 | 39 | 52 |
Asus ZenBook Pro
(UX580GD-BN017T) | 32 | 38 | 47 |
Lenovo YOGA
(730-15IKB) | 33 | 37 | 46 |
HP Spectre x360
(15-CH060NZ) | 27 | 32 | 48 |
Acer Spin 5
(SP515-51GN-88U9) | 19 | 29 | 39 |
According to the in-game benchmark, the Dell and Asus ultrabooks get the most out of their hardware. But let’s not forget Lenovo, which even manages a steady performance of over 33 fps. HP, on the other hand, falls as low as 27 fps in this benchmark, while Acer finishes the round with a meagre 19 fps.
Verdict
Which ultrabook is best for you? This is really a question of what you intend to use the ultrabook for.
The thrifty solution: get the most for minimum outlay
If you don’t want to dig too deep into your pocket, you’ll only want to consider the Acer Spin 5 or the Lenovo YOGA. That being said, they both seem to have a few problems in the manufacture. The thin chassis makes it difficult to incorporate efficient cooling. This becomes particularly apparent with the Acer Spin 5, which ended up with way too low a CPU score in Cinebench. It meant Acer’s Intel Core i7-8550U scored 150 points less than the Intel Core in the Lenovo YOGA.
The Acer ultrabook’s score takes a dive even in terms of graphics performance. At least you can game on the Lenovo and from a design perspective it looks OK. The same can’t be said of the Acer, with screen edges that are way too thick. The good thing about this device is the generous battery life.
However… if you really do want to save your francs, you’d be better off looking for a normal notebook in the same price range. That is unless you need a thin device – in which case grab the Lenovo YOGA.
Office royalty
When you’re using an ultrabook in the office, it’s not just about pure power. The battery life and keyboard layout also play a big part.
As far as keyboards go, the HP Spectre x360 and the Acer Spin 5 have the edge with their keypads. The Asus ZenBook Pro has the advantage of offering applications on the ScreenPad. And it also comes with a keypad pre-installed as standard. But it is worth pointing out that Asus has the shortest battery life of all the devices we tested and Acer has performance problems.
As we all know, only one of the devices can win the office crown. With the HP Spectre x360 you’re not only getting a well finished device. HP is also rolling out the red carpet for battery life (8 h 47 min for YouTube continuous streaming). Not only that, it features UHD resolution. And according to Cinebench R15 as well as the tentative results from Fire Strike Benchmark, the HP ultrabook can pack a punch when it comes to power.
The performance crown goes to...
But there can only be one winner of this match and so the award for the most compact, best finished and most powerful device goes to Dell. The XPS 15 with UHD resolution and AMD Radeon RX Vega 870 comes out on top as far as design is concerned. That’s something I hear reinforced in the complimentary remarks from my colleagues about this device.
The only shortcoming with the Dell is that the battery life isn’t the best in the group, coming in as it did at 7 h 20 min for YouTube continuous streaming. But for a day in the office that should be more than enough. Yip, you guessed it, the Dell would be another contender for office royalty. That’s as long as you don’t just stream YoupornTube at work.


I find my muse in everything. When I don’t, I draw inspiration from daydreaming. After all, if you dream, you don’t sleep through life.